- #Lansweeper vs sccm how to#
- #Lansweeper vs sccm update#
- #Lansweeper vs sccm Patch#
- #Lansweeper vs sccm full#
- #Lansweeper vs sccm software#
Where it falls short: A bare-bones app aimed primarily at on-premises environments difficult to impossible to roll out across cloud-based or more diverse configurations no GUI provided, limited reporting, difficult setup, plus inventory management is very limited with poor scanning accuracy. #Lansweeper vs sccm Patch#
What it does best: Free service (included with Windows license) supports a range of Windows systems and multiple patch types including other Microsoft apps easily scalable to handle very large Windows environments.(For instance, WSUS is an integral part of SCCM and many other security solutions, where it is often hidden from the user.) However, because WSUS is hard to configure and implement on its own (even with the Microsoft-provided configuration wizard), it’s primarily seen as a component that can be integrated into other security solutions. You can also use WSUS to run limited testing on new updates before rolling them out across your organization.
#Lansweeper vs sccm update#
It can download updates once and then roll them out to large numbers of systems across your entire environment, saving bandwidth and automating the update implementation. Plus, it’s free, making it an attractive choice.
#Lansweeper vs sccm software#
Unlike SCCM, WSUS is designed only for software updates and is therefore a dedicated patching tool. What Microsoft says it is : “ully manage the distribution of updates that are released through Microsoft Update to computers on your network.”.Patching : This complex product does offer some patching features, but drilling down and deploying them can be confusing and time-consuming does not natively support patching for non-Microsoft products best for larger jobs in on-premises networks due to its power and automation features.
#Lansweeper vs sccm full#
Where it falls short: A full management suite, making it expensive and complex since it offers far more than just patching limited reporting and lack of real-time monitoring sometimes necessitate third-party add-on solutions. What it does best: Powerful management of and deployment to a wide range of Microsoft endpoints, from on-premises servers and workstations to cloud-based Azure configurations simple automation. Microsoft refers to this subset of SCCM’s features as “a set of tools and resources that can help manage the complex task of tracking and applying software updates to client computers in the enterprise.” With the latest versions, SCCM has been wrapped up in Microsoft’s Endpoint Manager (MEM) suite of tools, which, confusingly, includes Intune (which we’ll look at a bit later).Įmbedded within SCCM are features that allow system administrators to set up software updates, or patches. SCCM is actually not a patching tool at all but a very powerful configuration manager. What Microsoft says it is : “An integrated solution for managing all of your devices.”. Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM) Let’s look at all three solutions, including what they do best and their limitations. UI-based), and the types of endpoints you’re supporting (local, cloud, mobile). The answer to this will depend in part on whether you’re looking for a single-purpose or multi-purpose tool, how much you want to get into the nitty-gritty of your systems (scripting vs. How do you know which one is right for you? And, of course, the more critical question: Do any of the choices offer a one-stop solution that will take care of your entire environment? Supporting Windows endpoints can be confusing because Microsoft alone offers three different choices. With that in mind, let’s take a dive into all three of these options, including how well they perform when it comes to taking the “heavy lifting” of patching off your team’s shoulders. Given that Windows is today’s leading desktop OS, under the hood of almost 80% of the world’s desktop PCs, many organizations use one of the three available tools provided by Microsoft: SCCM, WSUS, or the newest contender, Intune.īefore we even begin exploring Windows patching, it’s worth stopping to ask the broader question of why a single vendor, Microsoft, has seen fit to produce three different tools, each with its own focus area, in its attempt to solve the same problem-patching. And to some extent, most OS vendors today offer solutions that promise to make patching simpler via automation. #Lansweeper vs sccm how to#
2.1 How to Simplify Windows Patching (and Beyond)Īutomation is the key to breaking free from the cycle (somewhat) while still getting everything patched quickly.
0 kommentar(er)
